Case Study

    $100M Colorado-based Platform-owned Brand

    A holdout test on the largest brand in a PE-backed home services portfolio proved that 1.8x of matchback revenue from prospecting was genuinely campaign-driven.

    1.8x
    Revenue Proven Campaign-Driven
    ~$35K
    Proven Incremental Revenue

    The Challenge

    Matchback attribution is the standard way to measure direct mail ROI — but it has a credibility problem. Critics argue it overstates impact because some conversions would have happened anyway. For a PE-backed platform evaluating whether to scale prospecting spend, the question wasn't whether matchback showed revenue. It was whether that revenue was real.

    Attribution Skepticism

    Matchback captures conversions across channels, but without a control group there's no way to separate campaign-driven revenue from organic activity.

    Scaling Decision at Stake

    For a PE-backed platform evaluating whether to scale prospecting spend, the question wasn't whether matchback showed revenue. It was whether that revenue was real.

    The Solution

    Arch designed a holdout test on the brand's prospecting campaign — withholding a randomized control group from all campaign exposure to isolate the true incremental impact of direct mail.

    1

    Prospecting Campaign Launch

    Arch launched a direct mail prospecting campaign targeting new prospects in an expansion market where the brand had relatively low awareness.

    2

    Holdout Group Design

    A randomized subset of the target audience was withheld from all campaign exposure — no mailers, no emails, no touchpoints. This group served as the control.

    3

    Revenue Comparison

    After the campaign window closed, revenue from both groups was compared to isolate the true incremental impact of direct mail.

    Results

    The holdout comparison isolated the incremental revenue driven by the campaign versus organic activity.

    Metric
    Value
    Revenue from campaign-exposed prospects
    ~$43,000
    Revenue from holdout group (no campaign exposure)
    ~$2,000
    Holdout adjusted for audience size
    ~$8,000
    Adjusted matchback revenue
    ~$35,000
    Share of matchback revenue that is real
    1.8x

    The holdout group was adjusted for audience size to enable a fair comparison. The ~$35,000 in incremental revenue represents the difference between the campaign-exposed group and the size-adjusted holdout baseline.

    Learnings

    1

    Matchback Revenue Is Real

    The holdout group generated just ~$8,000 (adjusted) in organic revenue, compared to ~$43,000 from the campaign-exposed group. Campaign-exposed prospects generated 1.8x the matchback revenue, proving the campaign genuinely drove results rather than capturing organic activity.

    2

    Holdout Tests Resolve the Attribution Debate

    Direct mail attribution is fuzzy. A holdout test replaces guesswork with measurement, giving operators the confidence to scale.

    3

    This Opens the Door to Scaled Prospecting

    With 1.8x matchback revenue validated as incremental, the platform now has the evidence needed to expand prospecting investment across the portfolio. A holdout-tested attribution framework that proves real ROI.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Prove your marketing ROI with holdout-tested attribution.

    See how Arch measures incremental revenue — not just matchback — so you can scale with confidence.